Prepare for your exams with Eduvai.

The author's primary purpose is to

1. A contrast different types of sonnets
2. B criticize the limitations of the sonnet
3. C Identify the characteristics of a sonnet
4. D teach readers to compose proper sonnets

জাতীয় শিক্ষানীতি ২০১০ অনুযায়ী প্রাথমিক শিক্ষার মেয়াদ যে ক্লাস পর্যন্ত-

1. A <p>অষ্টম শ্রেণী</p>
2. B <p>পঞ্চম শ্রেণী</p>
3. C <p>ষষ্ঠ শ্রেণী</p>
4. D <p>সপ্তম শ্রেণী</p>

শরীরের কোনো অংশ পোড়া গেলে তৎক্ষণাৎ প্রাথমিক কী ব্যবস্থা নেওয়া উচিত?

1. A <p>ডিম ভেঙে সাদা অংশ দিয়ে প্রলেপ দেওয়া</p>
2. B <p>নারিকেলের তেল দেওয়া</p>
3. C <p>বরফ বা পরিষ্কার ঠাণ্ডা পানি দেওয়া</p>
4. D <p>লবণ পানি দেওয়া</p>

<p>লেখচিত্রে, x দ্বারা একটি গ্যাসের প্রাথমিক অবস্থা দেখানো হচ্ছে । লেখচিত্রে কোন রেখাটি একটি প্রক্রিয়ায় গ্যাসটি দ্বারা বা গ্যাসের উপর কোন কাজ করা হচ্ছে না নির্দেশ করে ।</p>

1. A <p>XA</p>
2. B <p>XB</p>
3. C <p>XC</p>
4. D <p>XD</p>

<p>পঞ্চম আদমশুমারীর প্রাথমিক রিপোর্ট অনুযায়ী দেশে পরিবারের গড় সদস্য সংখ্যা কত?</p>

1. A <p>কোনটিই নয়</p>
2. B <p>২.৪ জন</p>
3. C <p>৪.৪ জন</p>
4. D <p>৬.৪ জন</p>

৫ম আদম শুমারীর প্রাথমিক রিপোর্ট অনুযায়ী জনসংখ্যা বৃদ্ধির হার সবচেয়ে কম কোন বিভাগে?

1. A কুমিল্লা
2. B ঢাকা
3. C বরিশাল
4. D সিলেট

বাংলাদেশে বাধ্যতা মূলক প্রাথমিক শিক্ষা কখন থেকে চালু করা হয়?

1. A ১ জানুয়ারি, ১৯৯০
2. B ১ জানুয়ারি, ১৯৯১
3. C ১ জানুয়ারি, ১৯৯২
4. D ১ জানুয়ারি, ১৯৯৩

<p>Increased numbers of women in science can only be a good thing.Not simply because it is grossly unjust for women to be unable to experience the challenging but also hugely intellectually rewarding experience of participating in scientific research but also because the cost to society of excluding women is intolerably high.We need the very minds going into science, and it stands to reason that if women are excluded, we cut this resource in half.what's more, women bring new ways of thinking and a broader range of ideas to the table, which is crucial for science to flourish.All scientists have a responsibility to be feminists and encourage women to participate in science and fight the barriers that exist. However, this is often more easily said than done.There are several proposed reasons for why women are discouraged from participating in science at a ranger of levels-from primary school children to professors. Among other thins, these include a lack of role models and support networks-as well as harassment and bullying-but also less obvious barriers, for example, unconscious biases in job interviews and letters of reference.In the end, the way to tackle prejudice against women is to increase awareness of the particular challenging faced by female scientists and to put systems in place that promote equal opportunities.Meanwhile, we need outstanding females role models to show unequivocally that women can compete on the same intellectual level as men and encourage other women to follow their lead. Together we can create the level playing field which is so desperately required.</p><p><strong>Which of the following opinions is not shared by the writer of the passage?</strong></p>

1. A Excluding women from science is counter-productive.
2. B Participation of women science is beneficial for humanity.
3. C Women bring in new ideas and resources
4. D Women tend to be more intelligent than men.

<p>Increased numbers of women in science can only be a good thing.Not simply because it is grossly unjust for women to be unable to experience the challenging but also hugely intellectually rewarding experience of participating in scientific research but also because the cost to society of excluding women is intolerably high.We need the very minds going into science, and it stands to reason that if women are excluded, we cut this resource in half.what's more, women bring new ways of thinking and a broader range of ideas to the table, which is crucial for science to flourish.All scientists have a responsibility to be feminists and encourage women to participate in science and fight the barriers that exist. However, this is often more easily said than done.There are several proposed reasons for why women are discouraged from participating in science at a ranger of levels-from primary school children to professors. Among other thins, these include a lack of role models and support networks-as well as harassment and bullying-but also less obvious barriers, for example, unconscious biases in job interviews and letters of reference.In the end, the way to tackle prejudice against women is to increase awareness of the particular challenging faced by female scientists and to put systems in place that promote equal opportunities.Meanwhile, we need outstanding females role models to show unequivocally that women can compete on the same intellectual level as men and encourage other women to follow their lead. Together we can create the level playing field which is so desperately required.</p><p><strong>If an idea ''stands to reason'', it is-</strong></p>

1. A apparently sensible
2. B illogical
3. C irrational
4. D sensible

<p>Increased numbers of women in science can only be a good thing.Not simply because it is grossly unjust for women to be unable to experience the challenging but also hugely intellectually rewarding experience of participating in scientific research but also because the cost to society of excluding women is intolerably high.We need the very minds going into science, and it stands to reason that if women are excluded, we cut this resource in half.what's more, women bring new ways of thinking and a broader range of ideas to the table, which is crucial for science to flourish.All scientists have a responsibility to be feminists and encourage women to participate in science and fight the barriers that exist. However, this is often more easily said than done.There are several proposed reasons for why women are discouraged from participating in science at a ranger of levels-from primary school children to professors. Among other thins, these include a lack of role models and support networks-as well as harassment and bullying-but also less obvious barriers, for example, unconscious biases in job interviews and letters of reference.In the end, the way to tackle prejudice against women is to increase awareness of the particular challenging faced by female scientists and to put systems in place that promote equal opportunities.Meanwhile, we need outstanding females role models to show unequivocally that women can compete on the same intellectual level as men and encourage other women to follow their lead. Together we can create the level playing field which is so desperately required.</p><p><strong>In the passage, ''flourish'' means the opposite of-</strong></p>

1. A boom
2. B decline
3. C grow
4. D unfold

<p>Increased numbers of women in science can only be a good thing.Not simply because it is grossly unjust for women to be unable to experience the challenging but also hugely intellectually rewarding experience of participating in scientific research but also because the cost to society of excluding women is intolerably high.We need the very minds going into science, and it stands to reason that if women are excluded, we cut this resource in half.what's more, women bring new ways of thinking and a broader range of ideas to the table, which is crucial for science to flourish.All scientists have a responsibility to be feminists and encourage women to participate in science and fight the barriers that exist. However, this is often more easily said than done.There are several proposed reasons for why women are discouraged from participating in science at a ranger of levels-from primary school children to professors. Among other thins, these include a lack of role models and support networks-as well as harassment and bullying-but also less obvious barriers, for example, unconscious biases in job interviews and letters of reference.In the end, the way to tackle prejudice against women is to increase awareness of the particular challenging faced by female scientists and to put systems in place that promote equal opportunities.Meanwhile, we need outstanding females role models to show unequivocally that women can compete on the same intellectual level as men and encourage other women to follow their lead. Together we can create the level playing field which is so desperately required.</p><p><strong>Which of the following is not the reason for women staying away from science,according to the passage?</strong> </p>

1. A character trail
2. B inadequate facilities
3. C lack of role models
4. D orthodox mindset

<p>Increased numbers of women in science can only be a good thing.Not simply because it is grossly unjust for women to be unable to experience the challenging but also hugely intellectually rewarding experience of participating in scientific research but also because the cost to society of excluding women is intolerably high.We need the very minds going into science, and it stands to reason that if women are excluded, we cut this resource in half.what's more, women bring new ways of thinking and a broader range of ideas to the table, which is crucial for science to flourish.All scientists have a responsibility to be feminists and encourage women to participate in science and fight the barriers that exist. However, this is often more easily said than done.There are several proposed reasons for why women are discouraged from participating in science at a ranger of levels-from primary school children to professors. Among other thins, these include a lack of role models and support networks-as well as harassment and bullying-but also less obvious barriers, for example, unconscious biases in job interviews and letters of reference.In the end, the way to tackle prejudice against women is to increase awareness of the particular challenging faced by female scientists and to put systems in place that promote equal opportunities.Meanwhile, we need outstanding females role models to show unequivocally that women can compete on the same intellectual level as men and encourage other women to follow their lead. Together we can create the level playing field which is so desperately required.</p><p><strong>''Unequivocally'' means-</strong></p>

1. A clearly
2. B hesitantly
3. C indirectly
4. D politely